Jakarta Property
Rusunami subsidized apartments: Reaching their
target?
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Andhika
Suryadharma,
analyst
A couple of
weeks ago I had the chance to visit a property expo held by Real Estate
Indonesia, in which a lot of big and small developers participated.
Interestingly, BI's recent interest rates increase to eight percent, coupled
with soon-to-be administered higher fuel prices, has not dented consumer
enthusiasm for property.
It was good
to see that, amid these difficulties, developers and the government remained
creative in jointly introducing a new package, called "Rusunami" (Rumah
Susun Hak Milik), offering subsidized apartments to people of lower income
brackets.
At the
expo, I discovered mortgage lending by banks had already undergone upward
interest-rate adjustments. A year ago, mortgage loans averaged eight to nine
percent fixed for at least one to two years; capped at approximately eleven
percent for the third year. This average has now increased by some 200 basis
points to between ten and eleven percent.
Given the
current economic conditions, exacerbated by both fuel prices and toll fares
in various areas, it is more favorable for people with activities in urban
areas to reside in the city, whereby they can save commuting time and fuel
costs.
This is
particularly true given the government's plan to continuously increase fuel
prices until the country is subsidy free by 2010.
For an
example, let's take John, who lives in Bekasi (on the outskirts of Jakarta)
in a 2-bedroom house and spends Rp 600,000 to Rp 800,000 per month on rent.
Let us
assume his total daily commute covers forty kilometers, and that his car
demands one liter of gasoline for every eight kilometers. John pays Rp
450,000 a month in fuel over a five-day working week. Under the government's
proposed 30 percent fuel price increase, this sum would rise to Rp585,000
per month.
Add on to
this Rp 320,000 per month in expressway toll fares, and let's not forget car
service maintenance costs, which we will assume to be Rp 100,000 per month,
the average amount for a typical sedan car.
In total,
excluding daily necessities and mortgage payments, John has to bare
approximately Rp 1,500,000 (US$160) per month.
Now back to
Rusunami.
These
subsidized apartments have a lower price range of Rp 80,000,000 ($8,600), to
Rp144,000,000 ($15,500). Rusunami is limited to buyers with a maximum income
of Rp 4,500,000 ($500) a month. The apartments are also free of transaction
costs, and mortgages are government subsidized.
Developers
also gain, as they are exempt from incurring 10 percent value added tax
(VAT), construction license fees and are eligible to pay subsidized loan
payments.
While
Rusunami appears attractive to those of the lower-income bracket, problems
remain.
There are
early indications the distribution of Rusunmai is being poorly monitored.
Initially, the project was targeted at low-income groups, but there have
been cases reported where buyers earning Rp10,000,000 ($1,075) per month
were able to purchase the apartments.
With its
publicity spread at the real estate expo, Rusunami will naturally attract
those interested in acquiring the apartments for investment purposes.
Rusunami apartments in the Cawang area are said to be already sold out.
Another
issue is whether pricing has been set prudently given the target market. Let
us assume a maximum unit price of Rp144 million, and a 15 year mortgage with
an 11 percent interest rate.
A buyer
would have to allocate a monthly installment plan of Rp1.6 million, or 35
percent of their monthly salary.
It is clear
Rusunami, while appearing a good solution amid a scarcity of city housing,
is not a panacea.
Stricter
application processing by the Ministry of Public Housing, in conjunction
with the support of involved developers, may mitigate proceedings and help
avoid incidences of false income reports.
Despite the
government's good intentions, improvements remain needed in monitoring and
controlling the proper entitlement of potential buyers.
The
Ministry of Public Housing must implement a single-door plan to ensure the
interest rate subsidies reach the correct hands.
The writer
is a research analyst at Bahana Securities
Apartments in Jakarta, alternative
residences
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Burhanuddin
Abe,
Contributor, Jakarta
Back to the
city! That is the dream of today's executives and young families. At a time
when the city's traffic is heavily congested, living in the heart of the
city is truly advantageous. Clearly not much time is wasted in going back
and forth to one's office or school.
Indeed,
staying in the city center is a luxury and can be quite costly. Most of the
land in downtown Jakarta, which is a business and government center, is
occupied by office buildings. The balance of land is up for grabs by many
residents whose current number exceeds 10 million. This is one of the
reasons that apartments in Jakarta are an ideal alternative.
Take Puri
Casablanca, for example. This strategically located serviced apartment in
South Jakarta is promoted as a home minutes from your office and with easy
access to five star hotels, shopping malls and restaurants. It has short-
and long-term accommodation and offers comfortable living near business
centers and public facilities.
The
elegantly designed apartment suites are complemented by luxurious facilities
catering to the needs of international business executives and their
families. One can experience the luxurious comfort and convenience of a
modern city living in the heart of Jakarta's Golden Triangle.
Developers
in Jakarta are rushing to build more apartments that are sold on a strata
title or freehold basis or are rented out. In Kemang, South Jakarta, for
example, The Mansion, Kemang Village and Nirvana are being built. Nirvana is
offering exclusive residences in Kemang Raya that have an eco-home theme,
which is in accordance with today's trend that emphasizes on the
environment.
Nirvana
Apartments stand on 4,000 square meters of land. There will be 56 units on
its 14 floors, with 11 units having their own swimming pools. PT Asiana
Lintas Ciptakemang, the developer, designed the apartments in the style of
premium homes that have spacious rooms and imported materials. The price of
each unit varies from Rp 3.1 billion to Rp 9 billion.
Also under
construction in South Jakarta is the Senayan City Residence. Just like the
shopping mall, the apartments are strategically located close to the SCBD (Sudirman
Central Business District). The Senayan City Residence has 67 units and its
total leasable area is about 15,635 square meters. Apartments are sold on
35-year ownership leases for Rp 15 million per square meter, or rented on
six- or 12-month leases for between US$3,000 and $5000 per month.
Meanwhile
in Mega Kuningan, prime apartments have been offered since the beginning of
2008. Oakwood Worldwide is a company headquartered in the U.S. and has been
in the apartment business since 1960, with more than 30,000 high-quality
apartments located in 2,000 cities in North and South America, Britain and
several Asian countries. Now it is present in Indonesia under the name
Oakwood Premier Cozmo Jakarta.
Michael
Price, general manager of Oakwood Premier Cozmo Jakarta, said that the
occupancy rate of Oakwood apartments in a number of countries was at least
80 percent. He voiced optimism about business in Indonesia as the demand for
serviced apartments was high. The reason for his optimism was that Oakwood
Premier Cozmo Jakarta has 40 floors with an area of 51,000 square meters
built on a lot measuring 5,458 square meters. These are the most luxurious,
fully furnished apartments with a five-star rating in the country. Hence, it
is a profitable investment with return on investment that is guaranteed in
U.S. dollars.
Kempinski
Residences, meanwhile, says its location is the most strategic, located at
Jl. MH Thamrin No 1. The apartments are part of Grand Indonesia, which is a
super block constructed on a seven-hectare area, which is the former
location of Hotel Indonesia and Hotel Inna Wisata. Here one can find the
largest supermarket and shopping area, said to be the most luxurious in
Indonesia, as well modern office buildings that house Bank Central Asia and
Hotel Indonesia Kempinski.
The
58-floor apartment block is managed by Kempinski Hotelier, a German operator
that is more than 100 years old, and is very experienced at managing old
historic buildings such as hotels that cater to serving heads of state and
celebrities. Kempinski Residences offer several types of apartments, from
two- to three-bedroom units. The smaller unit is 123 square meters in area
while the larger is 261 square meters. Prices start from Rp 1.7 billion.
The
aforementioned apartments are indeed intended for the high-income segment,
but that does not mean that developers have forgotten about those with less
to invest as this segment consists of far more numerous customers. Downtown
apartments, whether high-end or low-cost ones, are indeed in high demand
because traffic jams affect everyone.
Currently
developers are offering more choices, such studio apartments. Many of these
sell for less than Rp 100 million each.
There are
also subsidized apartments, which can be found in various parts of the city.
They are subsidized by the government in the form of tax cuts, money
advances and low interest rates. The subsidies, however, only apply to
apartments selling for a maximum of Rp 144 million. At a price base of Rp 4
million per square meter, developers often build 36-square-meter units in
order to get the subsidy.
The
subsidy, of course, relieves much of a customer's burden. For example, one
only has to pay a Rp 21.6 million deposit for a 36-square-meter unit that is
priced at Rp 144 million. The subsidy given for the loan interest also makes
monthly payments lower. Instead of the normal 11 percent annual rate, a
customer pays between 6 and 8.5 percent. So, the monthly payment is between
Rp 700,000 and Rp 1.2 million.
When the
subsidy was introduced, State Minister for Public Housing Muhammad Yusuf
Asy`ari made it clear that only low-income families were entitled to the
housing, which is why the prerequisites for such purchases are very tight.
Many
well-known developers are building this type of housing, for example PT
Bakrieland Development Tbk, PT Grup Agung Podomoro and PT Perdana
Gapuraprima Tbk. Indeed, their reputations are at stake because they have to
provide benefits for customers of low-cost apartments while at the same time
ensure quality. They also have to provide attractive facilities.
The
government plans to construct 1,000 towers of subsidized apartments in the
country, 50 percent of which will be in Greater Jakarta, 30 percent in Java
and 20 percent outside of Java.
Many may
foresee economic doom and gloom with the looming price increase of fuel,
essential commodity prices, etc., all of which will affect the purchasing
power of almost everyone. However, one marketing director of a major
developer predicted that property sales would not immediately slow down.
He referred
to the country's situation two years ago when the macro economic condition
was not favorable after fuel prices were increased, but the property
business continued to boom. He said that the demand for property was still
high and would remain so because interest rates were low and it was
relatively easy to get a loan. "Next year, due to high inflation, interest
rates will go up. The price of building materials will also increase next
year. So, this year is the right time to look for or purchase a house or
apartment," he said.
The writer
can be reached at burhanabe@yahoo.com
Developers eye low-cost apartments, houses
Monday, May 05, 2008
The Jakarta
Post,
Jakarta
The
Indonesian real estate association (REI) is to construct 86 subsidized
low-cost apartment towers, with 600 units per tower, and 120,000 low-cost
houses this year for low-income households.
"We have
already built around 40,000 apartments in 61 apartment towers throughout
Jakarta. State-owned Bank Tabungan Negara (BTN) has financed 3,000 units,"
said Alwi Bagir Mulachela, REI general secretary, Saturday.
David Lelij,
sales manager of PT Tiara Metropolitan Jaya, subsidiary of major property
developer Agung Podomoro Group, said members of the association were
committed to providing such facilities at fairly affordable rates.
"We want to
provide low-income earners an affordable place to live in the heart of the
city," he said at the Real Estate Indonesia Expo 2008 opening.
David said
Agung Podomoro were constructing 6,000 units of subsidized low-cost
apartments in Kalibata, South Jakarta.
"Demand for
low-cost houses is increasing," he said.
David
welcomed high-income earners to invest in the low-cost apartments.
"But buyers
who earn more than Rp 4.5 million (US$488) per month will not be eligible
for the government subsidy and they will have to pay the tax as well."
Under the
scheme, the government will subsidize buyers earning less than Rp 4.5
million per month by paying 3 to 9 percent of their interest during a period
of up to eight years. The 10 percent tax on units worth a maximum of Rp 144
million ($15,616) will be lifted.
For houses,
the government will provide a subsidy of Rp 7.5 million, Rp 10 million and
Rp 12.5 million, depending on buyers' income levels.
The
government is aiming to have 1,000 low-cost apartments built by 2011
throughout the country and at least 1.35 million low-cost houses during the
2004-2009 period to accommodate the needs of low-income earners.
The
government supports developers by simplifying permit requirements to develop
low-cost houses and apartments.
Besides
Agung Podomoro Group, Gapura Prima Group, Artha Graha Group and Bakrieland
Development are also taking part in the program. (rff)
More expatriate families living in serviced
apartments
Thursday, May 22, 2008
With the
rising number of expatriate families eager to live in serviced apartments,
more serviced apartments have been designed to meet the market demand in
Jakarta.
Puri
Casablanca Apartment, for instance, said that it offered not only more
spacious rooms but also supporting facilities that are best suited to
expatriate families.
Puri
Casablanca said that its units measured 93 sqm up to 201 sqm, with family
facilities including children's playground and lagoon-style swimming pool.
"Our
children's playground is equipped with an America-made Little Lake," the
apartment management said in a statement.
Other
facilities include a children's pool, an international preschool, a barbecue
area, a spacious park, Jacuzzi, 800-meter jogging track, fully equipped
fitness center and mini golf range.
"The
average guest is foreign, staying on an average of one month to six years,"
it said.--JP
Jakarta's future buildings to be up close and
personal
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Tifa
Asrianti,
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
Multistory,
compact buildings are the future of construction in Jakarta, as the
administration seeks to make green zones cover 30 percent of the city area,
as required by the Spatial Planning Law, officials say.
Nana
Apriyana, head of spatial planning and land education and information at the
National Planning Board, said all housing in urban areas should be built
upward to ensure optimum land usage.
"Landed
residential buildings should be put in the suburbs and supported with a good
transportation system," he said.
Green zones
currently make up 9.6 percent of Jakarta's total area, and the Jakarta
administration plans to increase the amount to 13 percent by 2010.
But even
then the administration will have a long way to go -- under the law, green
zones must account for 30 percent of every city, municipality and regency.
Budi
Situmorang, head of national and island spatial planning policy at the
Public Works Ministry, said Jakarta would face difficulties in creating
green zones in its already developed urban areas.
He said the
30 percent target consisted of 20 percent public green zones and 10 percent
private green zones, meaning the regulation also applied to the private
sector.
"The
Jakarta administration can 'green up' using simple technology, such as
creeper plants on concrete columns and potted plants, or go high tech with
green rooftops and sky terraces. We'll count those as green zones," Budi
said.
He said the
central government would give the Jakarta administration until 2009 to
revise its target.
Yayat
Supriyatna, an urban planning expert at Trisakti University, said it would
be impossible for Jakarta to reach the 30 percent target on its own because
90 percent of the city's area had already been built.
"The
Jakarta administration would have to provide a lot of money to acquire the
land, because 1 percent of the Jakarta area is 6.5 hectares and the price
per square meter of land is high," he said.
Budi said
there would be a presidential decree in August regulating the spatial
planning of Jakarta and its outlying areas.
"The decree
will regulate spatial planning in Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Bekasi, Tangerang,
Puncak and Cianjur," he said.
The
government amended the 1992 Spatial Planning Law in 2007 because of
Indonesia's susceptibility to natural disasters. The new law is expected to
regulate land use to reduce environmental impact.
Some of the new rules in the 2007
Spatial Planning Law
1. Each region, city or regency, has to ensure green zones cover 30 percent
of its total area.
2. Every local administration has to prepare a zoning regulation providing
details on land use for every area in the region.
3. Anyone found guilty of breaching zoning regulations, including officials,
will face a maximum prison sentence of five years or a fine of up to Rp 500
million.
4. Citizens who follow correct procedures in developing an area will be
eligible for incentives such as easier processing for obtaining a
construction permit.
Source:
Spatial Planning Law
Land problems leave housing projects in limbo:
Govt
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
The Jakarta
Post,
Jakarta
Land
acquisition problems are threatening the government's ambitious five-year
project to secure 1.3 million subsidized housing units through the
construction of apartments and houses in cities.
Expensive
land prices provoked by legal battles over land acquisitions have impeded
the construction of the projects, State Minister of Public Housing Yusuf
Asy'ari said Monday.
"It will be
difficult to realize the planned target because of the expensive lands
needed to be cleared by the government," said Yusuf during a meeting with
the House of Representatives' Commission V overseeing housing, public works
and transportation.
He said the
Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Public Works should revise several
regulations related to the taxable value of property (NJOP), which is used
as a benchmark to determine land value.
"We have to
come up with a decision immediately, otherwise the projects could be
delayed," he said.
Numerous
infrastructure and public housing projects in Indonesia have run aground due
to land acquisition problems, while government efforts to resolve the
problems have come up short.
According
to the Ministry of Finance, the government is currently financing the
construction of 75 towers consisting of 45,000 units in Greater Jakarta, as
well as 44 units of houses to be rented in densely-populated regions.
The
government targets 1,000 towers to be built by 2011.
"We have
provided Rp 468.3 billion (US$50.3 million) to construct the towers and
rented houses in the first half of this year," Yusuf said, adding that his
office had allocated Rp 760 billion for the second half of the year.
The
country's major property developers have recently voiced their reluctance to
participate in the projects unless the government resolves land acquisition
problems and provides tax incentives as promised earlier by the Finance
Ministry.
The public
apartments and housing projects were launched in 2006 as part of a project
initiated by the Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono administration to help resolve
housing problems in cities.
During the
hearing, Yusuf spoke of difficulties in securing electricity and water
supply for new apartments and houses due to complicated bureaucracy within
related ministries.
Yusuf said
many people from outside Java were reluctant to buy subsidized apartments or
houses because they often faced blackouts and water shortages.
"However,
we will keep on building new towers and houses because by the time they are
completed, the (electricity and water) supply problems will have been
solved, and people will be able to move in," he said.
Low-income
people are also facing difficulties in trying to buy the apartments as they
can not afford down payments required by banks to secure mortgages.
"Amid a
period of declining public purchasing power, there should be certain
regulations passed by the related agencies to help low-income people easily
get mortgages," said Yusuf, who is also a senior member of the Justice and
Prosperous Party (PKS). (ewd)
'Government
must monitor housing project'
Thursday, June 26, 2008
The Jakarta
Post,
Jakarta
Experts say
tough monitoring is necessary to control the implementation of numerous
low-cost apartment projects in the city.
Benjamin
Ginting, from the Indonesian Property Study Center, said providing decent
residences for low and middle-income earners required a monitoring body for
support and to ensure all targets were met.
"So the
most important thing is that the program has begun. We must now support it.
Whether the 1000-tower target will be achieved or not is an issue we can
address at a later stage," he said.
He doubted
the target to significantly improve the lives of the poor and the city's
productivity could be met by merely building more apartments in the city.
"The
government must choose one of those two targets, because removing illegal
houses in slum areas and increasing productivity are two different issues
that need different approaches," he said.
Benjamin
said the target to increase productivity was more likely to be met than the
target to significantly reduce poverty because low-cost apartments in the
middle of the city might reduce traffic jams. Alleviating poverty, he said,
was a much more complex task.
"It is
almost impossible for people who live in slum areas to afford the cost of
living in low-cost apartments, which is almost the same as regular
apartments. Living in a high-rise building is more expensive than living in
a house," he said.
The
facilities offered in the apartment blocks are unaffordable for the poor.
Tap water and electricity will cost the same amount in the low-cost
apartments as they do in other apartments.
He urged
the government to focus on helping commuters find accommodation closer to
their workplaces, rather than reallocating residents from slum areas.
He said
government subsidies were insignificant compared to the private sector's
role, which involved planning and selling the units.
He said
because the government had such a small role in the project it was unable to
control how it was being run.
"They are
only focusing on providing subsidies, while there are actually other things
that they could do, like prepare the infrastructure for the low-cost
apartments, especially in areas far from the city center," he said.
Urban
planning expert Yayat Supriatna of Trisakti University said areas on the
city's periphery were more feasible for the development of low-cost
apartments because land in the middle of the city was more difficult to
purchase.
"Developing
high-rise apartment buildings is the only choice for Jakarta to overcome its
housing problem. But to develop low-cost apartments in the city center is
very difficult because of the expensive land prices," he said.
He said
given the apartments were best located outside the city center,
transportation would then be a problem.
The
integration between the 1000-tower program and the program to build
comprehensive city infrastructure, he said, was important because both
programs could support each other to work effectively.
"The
integration is important to persuade more low and middle-income earners to
buy the apartments that have already been built in Jakarta's outskirts. So
people who don't have private vehicles can still buy them," he said.
The current
development of low-cost apartments is not yet integrated with other
development programs involving infrastructure, transportation, green areas
river embankments, he said. (uwi)
Urban development project underway
Thursday, June 26, 2008
As part of
the 2007-2011 Strategic Policy of Urban Apartment Developments, five
projects are now underway in the city, including Menara Cawang in East
Jakarta, City Park in Cengkareng and Kebagusan City in South Jakarta.
The
development project came about after the failure of the Indonesian
government's 2003 National Development of One Million Houses program, which
aimed to provide low and middle-income earners with accommodation closer to
their workplaces and avoid the spread of slum areas in big cities.
The
2007-2011 project is intended as a guideline for all stakeholders involved
in the provision of the low-cost apartments.
The purpose
of the program is to develop 1,000 tower buildings to provide 350,000
low-cost apartments in cities with more than 1.5 million residents.
The project
has two objectives in developing the low-cost apartments: to improve the
quality of life for low and middle-income earners, as well as to improve the
efficiency of city infrastructure in order to increase economic
productivity.
The program
prioritizes cities with growing slum areas, like Medan, Batam, Palembang and
Greater Jakarta.
The program
attempts to improve accommodation supply, including simplifying the land
procurement mechanism in terms of land liberation and certification,
reducing authorization fees and taxes, and developing facilities needed by
areas where the apartments will be built.
For those
who buy the apartments the value-added tax will be lifted, a ceiling price
will be imposed and 2.5 percent of the purchase will be
government-subsidized.
According
to the policy, the total funds needed to implement the five-year program is
Rp 56.88 trillion (US$6.1 billion). The government plans to acquire Rp 6.15
trillion of the funds from the state and regional budgets and the rest, Rp
50.73 trillion, will come from the private sector.
Around Rp
4.3 trillion is allocated to subsidizing apartment purchases, while Rp 1.7
trillion is allocated to the development of facilities and infrastructure in
the apartments' areas. The rest, Rp 150 billion, will be used for creating a
conducive climate for the apartments.
Some
apartments will be sold and others will be rented out. The rented apartments
are for those who live in areas like river embankments and under elevated
roads.
During the
program's first year, several government-owned plots of lands were used for
the project, such as land owned by state railway company PT Kereta Api in
Bukit Duri, South Jakarta; the State Logistics Agency in Marunda and Kelapa
Gading, North Jakarta; and state housing company PT Perumnas in Pulogebang
and Pulogadung, East Jakarta. The program will also utilize private land in
Cawang and Cipayung, East Jakarta; Kebagusan, South Jakarta; and Cengkareng,
West Jakarta.
In order to
make sure the subsidized apartments meet the program's target, the
government has created a purchasing scheme based on buyers' incomes.
People who
are eligible for purchasing the apartments are those with monthly incomes
between Rp 1.2 million and Rp 4.5 million, while the apartment prices range
from Rp 75 million to Rp 144 million.(JP/uwi)
Indonesian Tax Laws
FeNew Tax Law Will Mean More Disputes: Lawyers
The Finance Ministry’s tax directorate may face a
soaring number of tax disputes in 2009 as the number of taxpayers grows
rapidly from the last financial year and a new tax law is imposed, the Tax
Lawyers Association warned on Thursday.
“In 2008 alone, the tax court had to deal with
around 2500 cases,” said Juniver Girsang, chief of the Tax Lawyers
Association, predicting that the number of cases was likely to double due to
a new tax law which came into effect in January.
Under the new law, taxpayers can challenge in
court the tax amount charged to them without handing over any money first.
The previous tax law obliged taxpayers to pay 50 percent of the amount
assessed by the tax office before they were entitled to challenge the figure
in court.
Juniver said that most taxpayers and tax officials
did not completely understand tax laws. “Taxpayers usually focus on the tax
calculation and are not aware of its legal implications,” he said. “Tax
officers also make mistakes that could harm taxpayers.”
He said tax regulations were also far from
perfect, and were even sometimes against the law. For example, taxpayers
could be sent to jail for not paying tax. Yet, he added, they were also
required to pay administrative sanctions for the same tax.
“This is against the legal principal
ne
bis in idem
[not twice for the same], because there are two punishments imposed upon one
mistake,” he said.
Anshari Ritonga, an tax law expert, said taxpayers
would play a significant role in ensuring tax collection succeeded, because
of Indonesia’s self-assessment system.
Indonesian taxpayers pay tax by self assessment
which means they list, value and report their taxable wealth by themselves.
“In the case of a tax dispute, taxpayers could
turn to tax lawyers to bridge their differences with the tax office,” he
said.
Tax office to issue regulation on tax incentive within days
Thursday, February 05, 2009
The
Jakarta Post,
Jakarta
The
tax office is moving ahead with its plan to provide incentives for companies
that cover, partly or entirely, their workers' individual tax liabilities,
and could issue a ministerial decree on the matter as early as this week.
Unlike
in many countries, most companies in Indonesia cover their workers' income
tax.
Darmin
Nasution, the Finance Ministry's director general for taxation, said the
regulation regarding the incentives, which was formulated to ease the burden
on companies amid the ongoing financial crisis, would be introduced on Feb.
10 at the latest.
"We
are running simulations to calculate tax incentives needed in each sector so
that we know the proper allocations," Darmin said following a hearing with
the House of Representatives' Commission XI on financial affairs.
The
incentive will form part of the government's fiscal stimulus plan totaling
Rp 71.3 trillion (US$6.3 billion) launched in anticipation of the impacts of
the deepening global economic crisis.
The
Finance Ministry said the allocation for the incentive would amount to Rp
6.5 trillion.
Not
all businesses will receive the incentive.
Businesses with good records of tax payment, and which are labor and export
oriented will be more likely to receive the incentives.
"I
cannot tell which sectors will receive the incentive just yet. We are still
discussing it," Darmin said.
The
Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry recently suggested the
government does not provide such an incentive to labor-intensive industries
as most of the companies' employees there were low-wage workers, whose
salaries were mostly below the taxable income threshold.
"On
the other hand, if the incentive is aimed at the middle to upper workers, it
will not do any good either especially if the companies use the extra money
gained from tax cuts to buy imported goods," University of Gajahmada
economist Sri Adiningsih said Wednesday.
The
country's imports rose sharply last year to $128 billion from $74 billion in
the previous year, cutting the trade surplus by 80 percent to $8 billion
from $40 billion in 2007.
Sri
said that other than giving incentives to urge people to consume, the
government should also establish an effective way to promote domestic
product consumption to cushion the impacts of weakening global trade.
"I am
not saying that we should adopt protectionist policies, but there are other
things the government can do to promote domestic products," she said.
"The
government can start cutting out the hassle in bureaucratic policies and
improving on infrastructure to reduce the cost of production and improve the
quality of the domestic products.". (hdt)
Tax rules still unclear for mixed marriages
Sunday, January 18, 2009
The
Jakarta Post,
JAKARTA
The
hopes of some mixed-marriage couples to obtain answers regarding taxation
policies have gone up in smoke.
A
seminar on taxation held Saturday concluded with more questions than answers
as couplesincluding Indonesian men married to foreign women and Indonesian
woman married to foreign mendiscovered that their marriages hardly entered
the tax office's mind.
"My
husband works as a diplomat. He does not have a taxpayer identification card
(NPWP)," said Ayu Castermans, a participant at the seminar organized by the
Mixed Marriage Community (KPC Melati) in Kuningan, South Jakarta.
A
panelist at the seminar said Ayu did not need an NPWP because she was a
housewife and her husband had diplomatic status.
The
panelist, however, added that another regulation implied that Ayu needed an
NPWP because there was a pre-marital agreement between the couple separating
the ownership status of the family's assets, in this case the property.
"I am
worried that one day, when tax officers check my asset report, they will
consider me to be violating the law because I have no NPWP but have an asset
under my name."
"They
will wonder where the money came from. And even though I will say it was
from my husband, how will I prove it to them?"
Ayu
was not the only one confused.
Another asked a hypothetical case about her non-Indonesian husband, who now
has an NPWP: What happens if he leaves the country for good but after his
retirement returns as a tourist?
"Should we report the tax, then?" she asked.
Formation Management Institute tax division head Aminarso said he could not
immediately provide answers to all questions.
For
Indonesian couples, the tax policy is simpler.
A
family is regarded as one economic entity with father as the head of family.
He is the one who must have an NPWP.
The
policy still applies if a husband is unemployed. The wife must pay for the
family's tax obligations, but the NPWP will still be under the husband's
name.
But
things get more confusing when it comes to mixed-marriage couples with
issues such as domicile, premarital agreements and property ownership.
Under
the government's program, dubbed the Sunset Policy, all unregistered tax
payers must present their tax report to the tax office within a year and
they must have the NPWP by December.
The
government, however, has extended the deadline until the end of February,
allowing more unregistered tax payers to hand in their reports. Cecilia
Ronnevik, who currently lives in Norway, questioned the Indonesian Embassy
in Oslo. She said she did not receive information regardingPolicy" from the
tax office.
However, Aminarso said he could not immediately give clarification on the
issue. (hdt)
Incentive set for firms that pay workers' income taxes
Saturday, January 17, 2009
Mustaqim Adamrah,
THE JAKARTA POST, JAKARTA
A
planned regulation under which the government will take over workers' tax
liabilities normally paid by firms, will be issued "within weeks", says the
tax office.
Darmin
Nasution, the Finance Ministry's director general for taxation, said late
Friday the regulation would come in the form of a ministerial decree and
would only apply to firms operating in sectors hit the hardest by the global
economic slowdown.
incentive will be available to companies in certain sectors hit hard by the
slowdown. We have been in discussions with relevant institutions over this,
including the Office of the Coordinating Minister for the Economy. We expect
to finalize the regulation within weeks," Darmin said, adding the eligible
companies would only enjoy waived tax liabilities for middle- to
lower-ranking workers.
This
means eligible companies must still pay the tax liabilities for employees at
the level of manager and above, he added.
On
Thursday, Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati said that to help ease the
burden on the private sector amid the weakening economy and to avoid
layoffs, the government would take over workers' tax liabilities normally
paid by companies.
In
Indonesia, unlike many other countries, most companies subsidize the income
tax liabilities of their workers, creating additional costs that would
normally be borne by the workers.
"We'll
choose [which companies are eligible for income tax incentives], based on
the impact of the [global economic] crisis, companies' track records and how
urgently these companies [need help] in facing pressure resulting from the
weakening global demand," Mulyani reiterated the plan at the State Palace on
Friday.
She
added the government expected the incentive would encourage the corporate
sector to keep workers and avoid dismissals.
Darmin
said negotiations would continue and center mainly on the criteria to select
eligible industries and work out the best mechanisms for implementing the
incentive.
The
incentive, if materialized, comes in addition to the government's plans to
spend Rp 27.5 trillion ($2.49 billion) this year in a fiscal stimulus
package for the real sector to keep the economic wheels moving despite the
tough challenges.
The
details of the total pledged stimulus package remain vague because the
government has yet to decide on priority sectors and allocation of funds for
them, despite clear signs of worsening conditions both internationally and
at home.
With
all these incentives, the government hopes to book economic growth of
between 4.5 and 5.5 percent - a fairly respectable figure at a time when
many others are suffering from a recession.
Succeeding in meeting the target means the government can keep unemployment
and poverty rates fairly in check.
The
government has gone all-out to try to protect the economy from the impact of
the global slowdown, although critics say the moves are driven more by
political purposes ahead of the upcoming legislative and presidential
elections.
However, for Indonesia's Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Kadin), the
government's plans are still laudable, regardless of the motives.
Hariyadi B. Sukamdani, Kadin vice chairman for monetary, fiscal and public
policy affairs, said the plan to take over companies' burdens in covering
workers' income tax liabilities would be good for companies and ultimately
workers.
"It's
definitely a good plan. Eventually workers will also enjoy the benefits,"
Hariyadi told The Jakarta Post on Friday. (hwa, dis)
printer
friendly
World Bank gives loan to RI to improve tax systems
Monday, January 19, 2009
The
Jakarta Post,
Jakarta
The
World Bank, one of the country's major donors, has approved a US$110 million
loan to the Indonesian government to help it improve taxation systems.
The
soft loan was approved and announced from Washington last week, a media
statement said.
"Indonesia has already embarked on a major effort to reform its system of
collecting tax revenues, most notably by revamping the directorate general
of taxation, introducing modern compliance management systems, and passing
the Tax Procedures Law in 2008," the Bank's country director for Indonesia,
Joachim von Amsberg said in the statement.
The
Finance Ministry's directorate general of taxation performed surprisingly
well last year, persuading over 3 million people to register for their tax
number (NPWP) and making a surplus of Rp 37 trillion in tax revenues, or 106
percent more than the planned state budget.
The
tax office succeeded by launching massive tax campaigns and offering
numerous incentives to people with an NPWP, including exemption from the Rp
2.5 million (US$227) exit tax for overseas travel and amnesty from
administrative fines for tax return adjustments for 2007 and earlier.
It
began its tax reform efforts in 2001, with a strategy aimed at: promoting
voluntary compliance among taxpayers; increasing the efficiency of
administration; and restoring taxpayers' confidence in the fairness and
integrity of tax administration.
The
office also runs other programs, such as taking over workers' tax
liabilities for companies hit hard by the crisis in order to stimulate
economic growth, the Finance Ministry's directorate general for taxation
Darmin Nasution said.
According to von Amsberg, the $110 million loan aims to help the office
embark on an even more progressive reform in tax administration through a
project called the Project for Indonesian Tax Administration Reform
(PINTAR).
"Through PINTAR, the World Bank sets out to complement this effort by
helping the Indonesian Government expand tax bases, both in terms of
increasing the number of tax payers and of transactions coming into the tax
system, which would in turn help generate more non oil and gas tax revenue,"
he said.
The
PINTAR program will help increase the directorate general's tax efficiency
and capacity, he added, through improved administrative systems, advanced
training of human resources and better management.
"Through strengthened staff capacity, integrity standards and a more
service-oriented approach, PINTAR will enable better taxpayer services
reducing compliance costs for the private sector," said World Bank senior
public sector specialist and project team leader, Jens Kromann Kristensen.
He
added a modern integrated IT system will also help raise productivity and
facilitate information exchange across the Directorate General of Taxation.
(dis)
Exit taxes, tourism
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
The
increase in the exit tax is a big joke. Where is this money going to, is the
paid tax being accounted for? On several occasions when traveling abroad I
have been approached by officials at the airport who told me to pay them
only Rp 500,000 (US$45) and I would then be escorted by an official and
bypass Immigration officials to board my flight.
I have
always refused to do this, figuring that, due to unforeseen circumstances, I
still might have to pay the required Rp 1,000,000 exit tax, so I could end
up paying Rp 1,500,000.
I also
witnessed how many passengers traveling abroad took this opportunity to pay
only the arranged Rp 500,000. This means the government is losing billions
per day which airport officials are pocketing.
Who is
the government trying to fool?
They
should abolish this exit tax altogether because officials at the airport are
smarter than the government.
Luring
tourists into this country with the Visit Indonesia 2008 slogan has failed.
As Teuku Agam noted in his letter to The Jakarta Post on Dec. 27, 2008,
tourists are being scared away by the ridiculous porn bill.
The
government should realize that the majority of farmers, who start standing
knee-deep in their paddy mud at 5 a.m. each morning, consume alcohol to keep
warm. Countless fishermen who stay out on their boats for two days or more
also drink alcohol to keep warm at night. These people would never survive
without their alcohol. Is the government now prohibiting this alcoholic
beverage too?
Foreign tourists drink wine, scotch, gin, vodka, and the sort because it is
part of their culture. We cannot forbid this just as they cannot stop us
from eating rice and noodles and smoking our kretek (clove cigarettes) when
we visit their countries.
Wake
up President Yudhoyono, succumbing to a group of ridiculous people with
ridiculous ideas only causes this country to lose billions in foreign
currency which tourists could be bringing into this country. Many are now
flocking to Malaysia (predominantly Muslim but without ridiculous laws).
Instead of imposing ridiculous laws, start improving infrastructure and
airport facilities. The airport toilets all over Indonesia are an absolute
disgrace. I just returned from Manado where the toilet facilities are a
total disaster. Gov. Sarundayang, do something about this, an international
conference on oceans is being held in your town soon.
LYNNA
VAN DER ZEE-OEHMKE
Bogor, West Java
The airport exit tax
Thursday, January 08, 2009
I
think the government should increase the exit tax even more. There is
nothing wrong with it. People that pay tax do not need to worry and people
that do not pay tax should at least pay tax when going oversees.
In my
view, anyone that can afford to travel is "wealthy" enough to pay the Rp 2.5
million. It should just be taken into account when booking a ticket.
For
the Indonesian government, it means an increase in income, directly and
otherwise indirectly, as a result of more registrations for obtaining a tax
number.
On the
other hand, people might be encouraged to spend holidays and subsequently
more money, inside the country of Indonesia, hence boosting the local
economy.
Don't
complain, no need to travel abroad when you're already living in such a nice
place where so many islands are waiting to be explored.
TIM
BEEKELAAR
Jakarta
Airport exit tax
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
I
agree with the policy because it will force people to abide by tax
regulations.
BUDIYONO FAMILA
Pontianak, West Kalimantan
It
looks like the start of another poorly thought out and implemented rule that
adds to the nightmare of traveling, not only to but now also from Indonesia.
Do the
boys who make these rules also stand in line to show their tax documents?
Ridiculous!
WALTER
Jakarta
I
truly support the new tax regulation in a bid to net more new taxpayers that
could increase state income. As it is known at present that only 10 million
taxpayers out of 230 million people have registered.
Therefore, the government needs to encourage as people as possible, mainly
the middle- and upper-income group, to registered for a NPWP. ABDUL RAHIM
Tangerang, Banten
Did
anyone tell the director general of tax that foreigners working here do not
have a family card? Neither do male foreigners married to Indonesians. So
how will spouses be able to leave the country without saying this egregious
levy?
JOHN SLACK
Jakarta
Poor
decision -- The tax office is mixing travel and tax! Wrong place to
implement new tax rules! If cash was in true value, the exit tax should be
Rp 10 million.
PETER T.
Jakarta
To
make payment easier and for clearer accounting, I really hope they can
accept payment by debit and credit cards. Am I hoping for too much? It is
2009 after all.
ANDREW
Tangerang, Banten
Thank
god, the new exit tax tied with NPWP will be valid for only two years. And
believe me, the new system will lead to mess and corruption at exit points.
However, I am sure the government will have control staff, as happened when
officers started checking fiscal payments in exit ports.
BADRI
Jakarta
I
agree with the increase of the airport exit tax.
ROBERT
Bekasi, West Java
It's a
good policy to encourage citizens to have NPWP, but the government should
make regular evaluation of its implementation.
AGUS RIPTONO
Bandung
I
agree with the increase of the airport exit tax. Don't be hopeless.
FITRI ASTUTI
Metro, Lampung
Exit
tax should have never existed in the first place. How can you charge someone
for leaving your own home/country for this matter?
RUDI
Yogyakarta
Increasing airport exit tax for adult Indonesian citizens who have no NPWP
is logical to compensate the taxes they have not paid. A good citizen will
voluntarily register himself to pay taxes for his own good.
MOELJONO ADIKOESOEMO
Jakarta
Insane, ludicrous, ridiculous, irrational! This 250 percent increase
translates into the great depression a la Indonesia.
WAYAN-GEDE
Denpasar
That's
too much, the government is grabbing people's money to meet their tax
target.
UDIBOWO CIPTOMULYONO
Jakarta
I
would like to suggest retired (people over 60) without NPWP who do not work
be exempt from paying airport exit tax, too.
ANGLE
Jakarta
Migrant workers should be exempt from this ridiculous tax, which should
never have existed in the first place!
NARTO
Ubud, Bali
Since
under 21s are exempt from paying exit tax, what about of those 60 and above
(retirees)? Do they enjoy the same privilege?
TONY
Jakarta
An
airport tax of Rp 2.5 million is bizarre. People who don't have a job don't
have a tax number! The partner can have a job so why pay airport tax for
him/her?
MAARTEN
Amsterdam
Taxpayers to assert rights
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
The
number of personal income taxpayers who will file their annual tax returns
before the end of March (the deadline for the 2008 income tax payments) will
most likely exceed 10 million. About 8 million of them will be first-time
filers, individuals who voluntarily registered themselves as taxpayers to
take advantage of the benefits granted to citizens with taxpayer
identification cards (NPWP).
The
dramatic increase in the number of registered income taxpayers is the result
of the massive tax campaign last year and the great incentives offered to
people with an NPWP, including exemption from the Rp 2.5 million (US$227)
exit tax for overseas travel and amnesty from administrative fines for tax
return adjustments for 2007 and earlier.
At
present, those without an NPWP will find it almost impossible to make
business transactions, including buying motorcycles, cars, homes or jewelry
worth more than Rp 100 million. Another advantage is that those with an NPWP
are subject to income tax rates much lower than those imposed on
unregistered taxpayers.
Certainly the steep increase in the number of people now falling under the
national income tax net will cause not only administrative consequences,
with the tax office suddenly having to process such a huge number of tax
return forms.
But
this development will also exert a political impact because more and more
citizens will see themselves not merely as common people or the "governed
ones", but as taxpayers who pay the government and its employees and who
will most likely demand stronger influence in decision making.
Administratively, the workload of the taxation directorate general will
increase sharply as newly registered taxpayers still need to be encouraged
to comply voluntarily with their tax obligations by regularly filing their
tax returns. Taxpayers should be educated to understand that filing tax
returns is neither complex nor costly.
However, voluntary tax compliance also will increase if the cost of tax
evasion and nonfiling of tax returns is very high. People will fulfill their
tax obligations if they know their chances of being caught by tax officials
and auditors is very big.
It is
comforting to learn the tax office is fully prepared with a much bigger
administrative capacity to serve a large number of taxpayers and has
developed a strong law-enforcement system.
But as
empirical evidence from developed countries and emerging economies shows,
there is a close relationship between taxation and democracy. Put another
way, there is no taxation without representation, because citizens will
demand something in return for increased taxation. This "something" could be
better public services or demands for greater influence in political
decisions.
Their
democratic right provides them access to information on the amount of
resources going to which programs in which areas.
The
government's dependence on tax rupiah from the people (earned income)
fosters interaction between the state and society, making the government
more responsible to its citizens. Moreover, the interaction tends to
strengthen demand for improved accountability of government institutions.
Hence
state dependence on local taxation will raise accountability among
politicians and decision makers.
The
rationale is that as long as the government is still perceived to be quite
lax in combating corruption, thereby letting taxpayer money go to waste,
there will be no significant improvement in the attitude and motivation of
the public to voluntarily pay their taxes.
Hence
voluntary tax compliance is also influenced by the taxpayers' perception of
the integrity of tax officers and the government's credibility with regards
to governance practices.
Otherwise, taxpayers might simply ask themselves, "Why do we have to pay
taxes if most of the money eventually ends up in the pockets of corrupt
officials?"
Airport
exit taxes
Tuesday, January 06, 2009
Your
comments on airport exit taxes which as of Jan. 1 increased to Rp 2.5
million (US$227) per person -- except for those with a tax number (NPWP) who
are now exempt.
Just
ridiculous! Now, I will have to stop some of my business travels to other
countries, and of course I won't be able to take my family. I guess that's
the goal of the Indonesian government, to stop people from leaving. I feel
bad for my Indonesian friends for sure.
JIM S.
Jakarta
I am a
young Iranian executive and just finished reading an article in The
Jakarta Post.
I'd
like to say that virtually all governments of the world encourage their
young people or young generation to travel abroad not only seeking jobs but
knowledge and ideas which will one day be brought home for the benefit of
the people and the country.
But
the decision of your government to increase the exit tax by more than double
will only make the younger generation and young business people more
restricted to travel and know less about what is going on outside their home
country.
How
can your country improve and prosper if you have such regulations and laws?
Honestly, I have been to your country a few times and I find there are many
laws and regulations so very stupid and without common sense.
I
believe such laws and regulations only benefit the politicians and filthy
rich business people. May God forgive your political leaders that are more
interested in their personal wealth than the welfare of ordinary citizens.
ALI KHARAZI
Teheran
I am
from Italy and have been traveling regularly in this region. I noticed that
the Malaysian, Singaporean and Thai governments have encouraged their
citizens to go abroad and earn a living without any form of restrictions
unless of course one has a criminal record.
The
decision made by your government to increase exit taxes is a very immature
decision. To be more simple, a very stupid move indeed!
This
shows your politicians make decisions based on emotions rather than common
sense. The whole world is laughing at your government with its decisions
that do not help the people, especially the poor. DAMIJAN BASIN
Roma
I
think it is not fair to increase it, especially for foreigners who don't
have a tax number. How are you going to promote Indonesia if the tax alone
is that high? LINDA
Jakarta
This
airport tax is not fair for a retired KITAS holders who no longer earn a
salary. They are entitled to an NPWP. The retired KITAS holders should be
exempt from the tax. BERNARD WILLETTE
Jimbaran, Bali
The
increase is OK with several conditions. First, if the government has a
system to verify that the NPWP numbers are not faked. Second, if it
guarantees that it would not become a new "product" that can be used by
immigration and airport officials to get extra cash.
And
third, if transparency is no longer questioned from the start to the end of
the process, the immigration office should present a corner box in major
media with an easy-to-digest summary and statistics, on a weekly basis.
Without considering the factors, the whole effort will become an interesting
case for officers of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the future --
but I would prefer to see anticipative measures. JO NAVARRO
Jakarta
Exit
taxes from Rp 1 million to Rp 2.5 million is not an increase, but more than
double.
Many
poor Indonesians still need to go abroad to find jobs, so don't burden them
with such taxes. ELRIO SYAMSUMAR
Cikampek, West Java
Authority and responsibility of related tax officers should be fully
described. SUWARSO
Jakarta
Why is
there no mention of tax relief for retired people. They worked and paid
their taxes, and now live on their pensions. They also deserve some
consideration. JOSEPH
Amlapura, Bali
This
new method and pricing for exit taxes is a good decision of the government
to punish non-tax payers. It would certainly encourage more and more people
to start paying tax.
This
method however needs proper planning and initialization to save time as much
as possible for those traveling passengers.
They
have to make it user friendly too. For those paying the fiscal they
could use ATMs to transfer money directly, instead of filling in forms and
waiting in long queues to get paid stamps.
For
those without credit cards, they could carry on using the current method.
They could also issue smart cards for current tax payers which would allow
them to just swipe and go through. ARUL VERMAN
Jakarta
The increase of exit tax
Monday, January 05, 2009
Your
comments on airport exit taxes which as of Jan. 1 increased to Rp 2.5
million (US$227) per person -- except for those with a tax number (NPWP) who
are now exempt.
I see
there is still a gap in the information about the exit taxes. What about
expatriates who are living in Indonesia with a retirement visa?
We are
allowed to stay up to a year without leaving the country, do not have any
income from Indonesia, and so cannot be registered tax payers.
So far
we have had to pay Rp 1 million if we exit. To pay Rp 2.5 million seems
excessive.
BHAGAWATI MORRIS
Kerobokan, Bali
What
is the Indonesian government trying to do with this country? They stop
tourists coming with that pornography law and now stop people going out by
raising the tax!!
What
about for all the housewives that have no NPWP? Do they have to pay that
ridiculous amount to visit their kids who are studying overseas or even when
they take their kids for holiday??
This
also makes me wonder, do the President and Vice President's wives also have
to pay this amount when they go on holiday overseas??
IRENE
Jakarta
I have
lived in Indonesia for around eight years now, and started looking at The
Jakarta Post around four years ago. This new airport exit tax fee law is
one of many stupid laws in this country.
It
will help only the rich and make sure that the poor will stay poor, but that
is the Indonesian culture.
SOSBUD
Jakarta
The
exit tax which was introduced by a very "creative" dictator many years ago,
still remains unchallenged in a democracy. It was even increased by 150
percent, as of Jan. 1!
It
reminds us of the dark Middle Ages when robber barons and street robbers
took whatever they could -- not a modern society where human beings (rich or
poor) are free to leave their country whenever they want.
I pay
a lot for my KITAS every year, a lot for an exit-re-entry permit -- why must
I and my Indonesian wife (who has no income at all) pay another Rp 2.5
million when we want to visit my family in Europe?!
Was it
obvious where the billions of rupiah drained away to during the
aforementioned dictatorship? It proved to me -- as a former lecturer of
economics -- that it is impossible to find any exit tax item in the state
budgets or annual balances over the last few years.
If you
go to www.pajak.go.id you will find heart-breaking appeals to
register for a Tax Number (NPWP), helping to get out of the global economic
crisis which also burdens Indonesia.
They
promise, for those who can show an NPWP when leaving the country, they will
be exempted from paying the exit tax.
We
will soon see if this is just another of umpteenth broken promise.
Facit
and pious hope for 2009: Be more inventive in erasing corruption than
squeezing your people.
MICHAEL BEER
Amlapura, Bali
It
seems to me this is a good thing. I mean, I disagree with the fiscal tax and
believe it should be abolished, but this is the next best thing. In theory,
only those who travel abroad and are not registered tax payers will have to
pay in increased fiscal.
If I
understand correctly, registered tax payers who are residents in Indonesia
will no longer pay fiscal tax. And, in 2011 the tax will be abolished
altogether. (I'll believe it when I see it!!) But for now, if you are a
legal income tax payer, the fiscal is done.
As for
Indonesians residing abroad, if they have their overseas address recorded in
their passport at the Indonesian Embassy in the country where they are
working/living they get four fiscal-free trips every calendar year.
This
has already been true for many years. I feel sorry for maids working abroad
who do not know this -- their puny salaries wasted on fiscal. It comes down
to a few things: Will Indonesians pay their tax? Which costs more, fiscal or
income tax? Can an NPWP card be forged?
LOREN
Jakarta
Will
the Tax Office also exempt citizens between 60 and 70 years of age and
Indonesians who want to do research overseas?
AGUS SATOTO
Jakarta
This
new regulation is not clear. Is it only for people without an NPWP? How much
does a person with an NPWP have to pay?
SYAHRUL LUDDIN
Vienna, Austria
Just
ridiculous! Now, I will have to stop some of my business travels to other
countries, and of course I won't be able to take my family. I guess that's
the goal of the Indonesian government, to stop people from leaving. I feel
bad for my Indonesian friends for sure.
JIM S.
Jakarta
I am a
young Iranian executive and just finished reading an article in The
Jakarta Post.
I'd
like to say that virtually all governments of the world encourage their
young people or young generation to travel abroad not only seeking jobs but
knowledge and ideas which will one day be brought home for the benefit of
the people and the country.
But
the decision of your government to increase the exit tax by more than double
will only make the younger generation and young business people more
restricted to travel and know less about what is going on outside their home
country.
How
can your country improve and prosper if you have such regulations and laws?
Honestly, I have been to your country a few times and I find there are many
laws and regulations so very stupid and without common sense.
I
believe such laws and regulations only benefit the politicians and filthy
rich business people. May God forgive your political leaders that are more
interested in their personal wealth than the welfare of ordinary citizens.
ALI KHARAZI
Teheran
I am
from Italy and have been traveling regularly in this region. I noticed that
the Malaysian, Singaporean and Thai governments have encouraged their
citizens to go abroad and earn a living without any form of restrictions
unless of course one has a criminal record.
The
decision made by your government to increase exit taxes is a very immature
decision. To be more simple, a very stupid move indeed!
This
shows your politicians make decisions based on emotions rather than common
sense. The whole world is laughing at your government with its decisions
that do not help the people, especially the poor.
DAMIJAN BASIN
Roma
Exit tax rise catches passengers unawares
Saturday, January 03, 2009
Indah
Setiawati,
The Jakarta Post, Denpasar
Some
passengers at Ngurah Rai Airport in Bali have been caught by surprise by the
increase in the fiskal or exit tax for travelers going overseas,
unaware of the new policy that exempts registered taxpayers from paying the
exit tax.
Ritchy,
an Australian living in Bali, who planned to depart from the airport the
second day the new rules came into effect, appeared astonished to learn that
the exit tax had been increased to Rp 2.5 million (US$222).
He
paid the exit tax without much complaint but was unable to hide his
disappointment about not getting enough information about the rise.
"I
think it's a bit too much. What makes me upset is that there was no written
announcement on the rise," he said Friday.
Even
at the airport, he said, he did not get thorough information about the
exemption for registered taxpayers, with the young tax officer on duty
mentioning only "NPWP", the initials for the registered taxpayer's number.
But
Ritchy took note of those four letters with plans to find more information
elsewhere.
Ritchy
was not alone, with a number of people -- mostly foreign nationals -- also
taken aback when it came to paying the increased exit tax.
The
written announcement about the exit tax increase, written in Indonesian and
English on two pieces of white paper, simply read, "According to the new
regulation UU No. 36/2008 and PP No. 80, rate of fiscal tax Rp 2,500,000".
A pile
of flyers containing detailed information about the new policy was seen
inside the fiscal booth. It turned out the papers were not for the
passengers, but for the tax officers.
One
tax officer, Nyoman Yodie, said his office was planning to hand out flyers
with the information but had yet to decide when.
He
said that although some people had been surprised, none had canceled their
trip.
"Many
Indonesians already knew about the new policy and straightaway showed their
NPWP card but a lot of Indonesians who lived abroad did not know about it,"
he told The Jakarta Post.
He
said he had received a number of phone calls from hoteliers and expected
that travelers would ask for information about the increase.
"I
don't understand why so many travelers still don't know about it," Yodie
said.
"The
policy was announced a long time ago, wasn't it?"
Putu
Suwardi, an Indonesian working in a hotel in Australia, said he was not
aware of the new policy and hoped the government would exempt passengers
from paying the exit tax.
The
exit tax at airports for people aged 21 years and above has been increased
from Rp 1 million to Rp 2.5 million, effective Jan. 1, 2009, to Dec. 31,
2010. The exit tax from sea ports has been raised from Rp 500,000 to Rp 1
million during the same period. From 2011, the exit tax will be scrapped
altogether.
The
increase in the exit tax is part of a government effort to encourage more
potential taxpayers to register for a tax number.
Exit tax freed, less red tape?
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
The
150 percent increase in exit tax fees to Rp 2.5 million (US$210) as of Jan.
1, 2009, Indonesian citizens aged 21 years and older will have to pay each
time they fly out of the country-- unless they hold a taxpayer
identification number (NPWP) -- has turned out to be a most effective way to
net new taxpayers.
Across
Indonesia, in the few weeks since the government announced the planned tax
measure the number of people registering for taxpayer numbers has increased
more than tenfold, with up to 100,000 new applications a day. The tax office
may have booked more than 10 million new taxpayers this year alone.
However, the new measure has yet to pass one crucial test: How easy will it
be to verify outbound travellers' tax documents at international terminals,
to check if they truly qualify for exemption.
According to the directorate general of taxation, travelers must submit a
copy of their taxpayer number, a passport and a boarding pass to tax
officials at airports or seaports for verification before they can obtain a
"free exit tax" sticker for their boarding pass.
This
means the taxation directorate will need to set up special counters for
verification which, if not conducted efficiently and properly, could become
a new bureaucratic hassle for travelers hurrying to catch flights.
The
tax office is well advised to recognize that verification is much more time
consuming than the simple exit tax payment system already in place and
operated by commercial banks in departure halls.
Tax
officials should see to it that the verification runs smoothly so travelers
are not held up in long queues, potentially causing them to miss flights.
The
ease and efficiency of this verification will depend on how the tax office
manages its workload during peak flows of outbound travelers.
Better
yet, if the tax office could set up a system allowing travelers to use their
taxpayer identification cards as smart cards for seamless verification.
But
again, registering taxpayers is only the first step in the ongoing drive to
broaden the national taxpayer base. The tax office also needs to develop an
effective and efficient tax administration and introduce tough law
enforcement to minimize tax evasion and tax fraud.
If law
enforcement remains lax and the institutional capacity of the tax
administration is not improved, the massive number of new taxpayer
registrations could turn out to be a flop, as happened in a similar campaign
in 2005.
In
2005, the tax directorate boasted having almost tripled the number of
registered taxpayers to more than 10 million individuals, but the number of
taxpayers who filed annual tax returns last year remained stagnant, at
around 3.7 million as of this year.
The
concerted tax campaign this year has also registered more than 10 million
new taxpayers, but what is the significance of these new registrations
unless the number of taxpayers filing annual tax returns increases
significantly too?
Tax office gears up to phase out abhorred exit tax
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Aditya
Suharmoko,
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
As the
enforcement draws near of a new policy on the much-decried fiskal, or
exit tax for travelers going overseas, the tax office says it will do its
utmost to spare travelers any inconvenience.
On
Tuesday, Darmin Nasution, the Finance Ministry's director general of
taxation, said his office had set up all the necessary systems at
international ports and airports to support the new "free exit tax" policy.
Besides performing real-time simulations, the directorate has also prepared
directions and pamphlets to guide travelers looking to benefit from the exit
tax exemption.
"There
will be directions for each group wishing to get exit tax exemption, so they
won't get confused," Darmin said.
All of
the country's international gateways will feature a line for each of the
three types of tax-exempt travelers -- registered taxpayers, those below 21
years of age, and those with supporting documents.
Under
the new policy, the exit tax for those aged 21 years and above departing
from airports will be raised from Rp 1 million (US$91) to Rp 2.5 million,
and for those traveling by sea from Rp 500,000 to Rp 1 million, effective
from Jan. 1, 2009, to Dec. 31, 2010.
The
tax will apply only to those not in any of the three groups.
The
exit tax will be scrapped entirely by 2011.
"After
checking in at ports or airports, registered taxpayers will need to validate
their tax numbers (NPWP) with the tax office (there), and bring a copy of
their NPWP," Darmin said.
Family
members of registered taxpayers seeking exemption from the exit tax will
have to provide a copy of the "family card", he added.
Under
the new income tax law, people below 21 years of age are exempt from paying
the exit tax. The previous law only exempted children below 12 years of age.
Those
seeking to avoid the tax must register for an NPWP at least three days
before departing, to allow the tax office sufficient time to prepare the
files needed at the gateways.
"We
can make the service faster; we're bringing our master file (to the ports
and airports), putting our entry there," Darmin said.
However, the tax office previously said if the NPWP was rejected by port
officials, travelers would have to pay the tax.
The
new exit tax policy is aimed at encouraging middle- to upper-income
residents to pay taxes. At present, only 10 million taxpayers out of the
country's total population of 230 million people have been registered by the
tax office.
The
taxpayers include individuals, companies and institutions.
Those
exempt from paying exit tax directly:
1.
People below 21 years of age
2. Foreigners staying in Indonesia no more than 183 days within the last 12
months
3. Diplomats and people working for the diplomatic corps
4. International organization officials, including families
5. Indonesian citizens with residency permits from a foreign country
6. Haj pilgrims
7. Indonesian citizens working abroad
8. People departing Indonesia by land
9. NPWP holders and their dependents
Those
exempt from paying exit tax, with supporting documents:
1.
Foreign students in Indonesia
2. Foreigners involved in research in science and culture, cooperation in
technology, religious and humanitarian missions
3. Foreigners working in Batam, Bintan and Karimun and liable to pay income
tax as per Article 21 or Article 26.
4. Disabled and ill people seeking medical treatment abroad paid for by
social organizations
5. Members of art, culture and sport missions who represent Indonesia abroad
6. Students in a student-exchange program
7. Indonesian citizens working abroad with approval from the Manpower and
Transmigration Ministry
Unregistered taxpayers to pay double for exit tax
Friday, December 26, 2008
Aditya
Suharmoko,
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
The
tax office has officially announced an increase in the much-decried
fiskal, or exit tax for travelers going overseas, in part to put to rest
widespread speculation over the amount of the increase.
The
exit tax for those aged 21 years and above departing from airports will be
raised from Rp 1 million (US$91) to Rp 2.5 million, and for those traveling
by sea from Rp 500,000 to Rp 1 million, effective Jan. 1, 2009, to Dec. 31,
2010.
However, registered taxpayers will not have to pay a single cent; and
starting from 2011, the exit tax will be scrapped altogether, according to
the Finance Ministry's directorate general of taxation.
Director general Darmin Nasution said the increase in exit tax was part of
an effort to get more potential taxpayers to register for a tax number (NPWP).
It is
proving a smart ruse, with many middle-to-high-income residents flocking to
nearby tax offices to get an NPWP to comply with the office's Sunset Policy
program that ends on Dec. 31.
The
program, under which applicants' tax obligations in previous years are
written off, has seen people rushing to register themselves.
This
month alone, the number of people registering for an NPWP was between 50,000
and 100,000 per day, up from about 7,000 people daily in previous months.
The
exit tax will from now on become an up-front payment for income tax.
For
instance, an employee whose income tax is Rp 20 million per year and who has
traveled abroad twice this year -- paying Rp 1 million in exit tax each time
-- will only have to pay Rp 18 million in income tax when filing their tax
returns in March 2009.
For
those not yet registered, the new exit tax of Rp 2.5 million could prove
very daunting.
Satria
Ramadhan, who will go to Bangkok for holidays in early January, said he was
glad to have registered for an NPWP.
"Otherwise, I would have to pay Rp 2.5 million. I would have definitely
canceled my trip if I had to pay such a huge amount."
Another traveler, Frederick Tobing, praised the move by the directorate
general of taxation.
"It's
a smart move. Most people, including myself, will rush to register at the
tax office, just to avoid paying the exit tax."
The
directorate general of taxation estimates up to 10 million new taxpayers
have registered this year, Darmin said.
"I
didn't expect the number to be this huge. No one expected to tap 10 million
new taxpayers," he said.
To get
exemption from paying the exit tax, registered taxpayers must submit a copy
of their NPWP, passport and boarding pass to tax officials at airports or
ports.
If the
NPWP is declared valid, the officials will put a "free exit tax" sticker on
the boarding pass. If it is not valid, travelers will have to pay the exit
tax.
1.
Exit tax from airports for people aged 21 years and above raised from Rp 1
million to Rp 2.5 million.
2. Exit tax from ports for people aged 21 years and above raised from Rp
500,000 to Rp 1 million.
3. Those automatically exempt from paying the exit tax include: People aged
less than 21 years; foreigners staying in Indonesia no more than 183 days
within the last 12 months; diplomats; employees of international
organizations; Indonesian citizens with official documents from other
countries, including students; Haj pilgrims and Indonesian migrant laborers.
4. Those exempt from paying the exit tax but required to provide documentary
proof: Foreign students with letters of recommendation from their
universities; foreign researchers; foreign workers in Batam, Bintan and
Karimun; disabled or ill people seeking medical treatment abroad paid for by
social organizations; people traveling for art, culture, sport and religious
missions, and students in a student-exchange program.
Businesses seek extension to tax deadline policy
Monday, December 22, 2008
Mustaqim Adamrah and Aditya Suharmoko,
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
The
Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Kadin) has requested the
government to postpone a deadline to improve tax filing and undertake tax
registration until March next year as businessmen are busier than ever
coping with the impact of the global economic slowdown.
Kadin
chairman Mohamad Suleman Hidayat said Sunday businesses were expecting the
deadline to be extended because the global economic downturn had
unexpectedly pushed most businessmen to focus on drawing up
counter-measures.
"We
have asked the government to delay the deadline for the sunset policy for
another three months because of the (economic) crisis," Hidayat told
reporters on the sidelines of a Kadin national meeting.
"All
businesses are currently thinking of how to handle their own companies
(amidst the crisis)."
As a
result of a new tax law on general procedure late last year, the government
has issued rules requiring all taxpayers to honestly report their taxes and
comply with the existing regulations.
Under
the new policy, often referred to as a "sunset policy", the government has
also given potential taxpayers time to get a tax registration number and
start to comply with the regulations.
The
government has given one year in which it has waived administrative
penalties for previous non-compliance in exchange for accurate tax reporting
and registration before starting to impose stiffer sanctions on violators
next year.
Taxpayers money is the largest single source of income to the state budget,
accounting for about 70 percent of state budget revenue.
According to the directorate general of taxation, Indonesia only has about 6
million taxpayers in a population of 230 million people.
Hidayat argued it was difficult to comply with the sunset policy as it
involved lengthy procedures to complete all the filings, including balance
sheets.
He
suggested the government should issue a regulation-in-lieu-of-law to allow a
postponement of the sunset policy.
In
response to Kadin's request, Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati said the
government would study how to make that possible.
"Well
basically it's impossible for us to extend the registration period as it's
already been stipulated in the law," she said.
"What
is possible is an administrative loophole that may allow such treatment, and
I'll try to look into that," she added.
Mulyani said the sunset policy had been a success as there were around
200,000 requests for tax file number recorded every day at the moment, as
the present deadline expired at the end of the year.
The
directorate general of taxation has planned stiff measures for those having
no tax registration once the sunset period is over, including a new plan to
raise overseas travel tax by more than double for those without tax
registration numbers.
Incentives for taxpayers
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Citizens
with taxpayer registration numbers will soon be exempted from the Rp 1
million (US$100) exit tax which all Indonesians, irrespective of age, must
pay when they go overseas.
A bigger
incentive is that children of a father or mother with a taxpayer number will
also be exempted from the exit tax if they are under 21 years old.
This
incentive, included in the new income tax law to be enacted later this year,
is one of the measures approved by the government and the House of
Representatives to encourage more people to register as income taxpayers.
The
government seems to have learned lessons from previous tax awareness
campaigns that listing new taxpayers without incentives is not an effective
way of getting people to regularly file income tax returns.
The
directorate general of taxes, instead of waiting for people to voluntarily
register as taxpayers, conducted a massive, property-based taxpayer
registration drive in 2005 by sending taxpayer registration numbers to
people in middle and high-income housing complexes in Jakarta and
surrounding suburbs.
This
registration drive brought in more than seven million potential new
taxpayers. However only a minority eventually filed annual tax returns due
to weak collection systems and the absence of an incentive-disincentive
mechanism.
Data from
the taxation directorate general shows that as of last month, there were six
million individuals and entities with taxpayer registration numbers. Yet
only 2.4 million regularly filed annual tax returns, of which 1.3 million
were personal taxpayers (or 0.5 percent of the whole population) while 1.1
million represented institutional taxpayers (legal entities).
The income
tax bill currently under discussion at the House of Representatives will
establish incentives for individuals and institutions to get taxpayer
registration numbers, with disincentives for non-registration.
The House
and the government have also agreed a provision which would make the income
tax burden imposed on trading firms without taxpayer numbers twice as high
as the standard rate set for companies with registration numbers.
Individuals
without taxpayer numbers will also find it increasingly difficult to do
transactions. The income tax bill, which is expected to be approved within
the next few weeks, will make it impossible for people without taxpayer
numbers to buy diamonds or jewellery, or cars worth more than Rp 1 billion
and apartments valued at over Rp 2 billion.
These
incentives and disincentives are designed to encourage individuals of 21
years old or older to get taxpayer registration numbers and to file annual
income tax returns.
However,
taxpayer data will not help broaden the taxpayer base if law enforcement
remains lax and the administrative capacity of the tax authorities is not
improved.
Certainly,
newly registered taxpayers still have to be encouraged to voluntarily comply
with their tax obligations by filing tax returns. Taxpayers should be
educated to understand that filing tax returns is not complex or costly.
However,
voluntary tax compliance will increase if the cost of tax evasion and of the
non-filing of tax returns is higher. People are also more likely to fulfill
their tax obligations if they know there is a bigger chance of being caught
by tax officials and auditors for tax evasion. This environment requires a
stronger law-enforcement system and a higher tax administration capacity to
handle taxpayers.
The
stronger incentives and disincentives will help significantly increase the
number of registered income taxpayers next year but this will pose a
challenge to the tax directorate general to expand and improve its
administrative capacity.
Yet more
challenging is that tax officials will have to work harder to improve their
image because the tax office has long been perceived to be one of the most
corrupt public institutions in the country. The government would also be
well advised to understand that voluntary tax compliance is influenced by
the public perception of how tax receipts are used by the government (good
governance).
Offices
Houses
Shophouses
Industrial
factories & warehouses
|